Introduction to Cultural Anthropology: Anth 101
M W F 3:15 – 4:15 RKS 160
Text: Introducing Cultural Anthropology 4th
ed., Roberta Edwards Lenkeit
On-line readings.
Course Description: Anthropological approaches
and perspectives on humans, their culture, and their society; early and
prehistoric humans. Basic concepts for
analyzing cultural behavior, and comparison of non-Western with Western
societies, will be presented.
Course Objectives: Upon successful completion of this course the
student can be expected to:
1. Define anthropology and explain key concepts
of the discipline.
2. Analyze cultural behavior; including their
own and others’ cultures.
3. Explain key differences between Western
society and non-Western society.
4. Identify how culture influences individuals.
Course Evaluations:
Evaluation
|
Points |
|
Grade Scale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio |
100
|
|
93%-100% |
A |
73%-76% |
C |
|
Quizzes |
60 |
|
90%-92% |
A- |
70%-72% |
C- |
|
Discussion Papers |
60
|
|
87%-89% |
B+ |
67%-69% |
D+ |
|
Cultural Analysis |
50 |
|
83%-86% |
B |
63%-66% |
D |
|
Participation |
30
|
|
80%-82% |
B- |
60%-62% |
D- |
|
Total |
300 |
|
77%-79% |
C+ |
0%-59% |
F |
Final Grades: Final grades will be
calculated on a straight percentage scale as indicated. Total points earned will be summed and
divided by 300. Extra credit is not
offered in this class.
Attendance: Attendance is necessary for the successful
completion of this course. There are 30
participation points that are directly related to attendance. The discussion papers and quizzes are
in-class activities. You are responsible
for all materials and information that is given in class. Tardiness or non-attendance does not excuse
you from these responsibilities or from any assignments or activities. This means that no matter the reason, if you
do not do the work in class at the appropriate time you will have to make it up
according to the make-up policy.
Make Ups: You can make up only the portfolio,
with certain conditions. Any work done
before the due date will not be assessed a late penalty, all late work will
automatically be assessed a 10% penalty and an additional 10% penalty per week
that it is late.
Assignments:
Portfolio. The purpose of the Portfolio is to give you a place to record your exploration of the course material. It will be evaluated on how well you document your exploration, and on the depth and breadth of your exploration. It must include at least one of the following, and may include multiple of all but the kinship chart: 1) response to readings, 2) review of a research article, 3) your kinship chart, 4) interview of a foreign student/person, 5) review of a PREAPPROVED film. 6) various assignments during the semester that I will give. Each menu option is worth 5 points, so you need at least 20 different specific things in addition to your writings and thoughts on the course topics. They will be turned in for evaluation on May 30 and July 16 (10 entries each time).
Discussion papers. The beginning of each section will be devoted to small group interactions. Each student will come to class having researched something that is relevant to the topic for the day. In small groups you will share your research findings which will also need to be written up in a single page. These papers will be turned in to me for evaluation that class period. Discussion papers may not be turned in late. Be sure to provide references.
Quizzes. In each section will be a 5 point quiz over the reading from the textbook.
Cultural Analysis. You will keep an anthropological field journal of your exploration of a culture and write up a final report on your analysis of the culture. This will be further explained during the first section of the course material. Formatting: one inch margins, black ink, Single Spaced, 12 point - Times New Roman font, NO coversheet. No more than 10 pages in length.
Participation. You are expected to come to class prepared and to participate. Attendance is necessary for the successful completion of this course. There are 30 participation points that are directly related to attendance and participation.
Some thoughts from and about
our namesake:
Brigham Young's sanguine
discourses on education were meant to stir his people up and shame them out of their
intellectual lethargy. No one knew better than he the weaknesses of human
nature ("Mankind are weak and feeble, poor and needy; how destitute they
are of true knowledge, how little they have when they have any at all!");
the hebetude of minds used to having others think for
them ("The great masses of the people neither think nor act for
themselves. . . . I see too much of this gross ignorance among this chosen
people of God"); the hesitancy of the uprooted, tending either "to
hide ourselves up from the world" or "to pattern after the people
they had left"—both wrong; the smugness of the chosen people, who
"imagine that they must begin and unlearn the whole of their former
education," and who expect God to give them everything on a platter:
"Have I any good reason to say to my Father in heaven, 'Fight my battles,'
when He has given me the sword to wield, the arm and the brain that I can fight
for myself?" The Saints were much too easily satisfied with themselves:
"How vain and trifling have been our spirits, our conferences, our
councils, our meetings, our private as well as public conversations—too low,
too mean, too vulgar, too condescending for the dignified characters of the
called and chosen of God," wrote the Prophet Joseph from Liberty Jail.
"Condescending"
means settling for inferior goods to avoid effort and tension. Brigham
hated that: "That diffidence or timidity we must dispense with. When it
becomes our duty to talk, we ought to be willing to talk. . . . Interchanging
our ideas and exhibiting that which we believe and understand affords an
opportunity for detecting and correcting errors"—the expanding mind must
be openly and frankly critical, come hell or high council; without that we get
"too much of a sameness in this community"—"I am not a
stereotyped Latter-day Saint, and do not believe in the doctrine. . . . Are we
going to stand still? Away with stereotyped 'Mormons.'" -Hugh Nibley, Brother Brigham Challenges
the Saints, edited by Don E. Norton and Shirley S. Ricks [Salt Lake City
and Provo: Deseret Book Co., Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon
Studies, 1994], 329 - 330.)
Brigham was right after
all. As administrative problems have
accumulated in a growing Church, the authorities have tended to delegate the
business of learning to others, and those others have been only too glad to
settle for the outward show, the easy and flattering forms, trappings, and
ceremonies of education. Worse still, they have chosen business-oriented,
career-minded, degree-seeking programs in preference to the strenuous,
critical, liberal, mind-stretching exercises that Brigham Young recommended. We
have chosen the services of the hired image-maker in preference to unsparing
self-criticism, and the first question the student is taught to ask today is
John Dewey's golden question: "What is there in it for me?" -Hugh
Nibley, Brother Brigham Challenges the Saints, edited by Don E. Norton
and Shirley S. Ricks [Salt Lake City and Provo: Deseret Book Co., Foundation
for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies, 1994], 338.)
Plagiarism and Cheating
policy: Plagiarism and cheating are not tolerated in
this class. Any evidence of plagiarism
or cheating will be grounds for an automatic F in the course. Plagiarism is copying someone else’s
work. This includes your peers, any
written sources and the internet. Any
information that is not your own original thoughts should be properly documented. For example, if you write about the
relationship between religion and people, and include complete sentences or
ideas from another author you need to acknowledge them. It is ok to include something that Thomas
Jefferson wrote, just make sure that it is clear that you are not presenting it
as your own work. It is appropriate to
write: Thomas Jefferson said, “yada yada
yada”. It is
inappropriate to say that religion is the opium of the people without
acknowledging that Marx said this, not you.
|
W |
Apr 18 |
Intro |
|
F |
Apr 20 |
Discuss readings |
|
M |
Apr 23 |
Chapter 1 Discussion |
|
W |
Apr 25 |
Chapter 1 Lecture |
|
F |
Apr 27 |
Chapter 1 Cultural analysis |
|
M |
Apr 30 |
Chapter 2 Discussion |
|
W |
May 2 |
Chapter 2 Lecture |
|
F |
May 4 |
Chapter 2 Cultural analysis |
|
M |
May 7 |
Chapter 3 Discussion |
|
W |
May 9 |
Chapter 3 Lecture |
|
F |
May 11 |
Chapter 3 Cultural analysis |
|
M |
May 14 |
Chapter 4 Discussion |
|
W |
May 16 |
Chapter 4 Lecture |
|
F |
May 18 |
Chapter 4 Cultural analysis |
|
M |
May 21 |
Chapters 5 Discussion |
|
W |
May 23 |
Chapters 5 Lecture |
|
F |
May 25 |
Chapters 5 Cultural
analysis |
|
M |
May 28 |
NO Class, Memorial Day |
|
W |
May 30 |
Chapters 6 Discussion Portfolio Due |
|
F |
June 1 |
Chapters 6 Lecture |
|
M |
June 4 |
Chapters 6 Cultural
analysis |
|
W |
June 6 |
Chapter 7-8 Discussion |
|
F |
June 8 |
Chapter 7-8 Lecture |
|
M |
June 11 |
Chapter 7-8Cultural
analysis |
|
W |
June 13 |
Chapter 9 Discussion |
|
F |
June 15 |
Chapter 9 Lecture |
|
M |
June 18 |
Chapter 9 Cultural analysis |
|
W |
June 20 |
Chapter 10 Discussion |
|
F |
June 22 |
Chapter 10 Lecture |
|
M |
June 25 |
Chapter 10 Cultural
analysis |
|
W |
June 27 |
Chapter 11 Discussion |
|
F |
June 29 |
Chapter 11 Lecture |
|
M |
July 2 |
Chapter 11 Cultural
analysis |
|
W |
July 4 |
NO Class, Independence Day |
|
F |
July 6 |
Chapter 12 Discussion |
|
M |
July 9 |
Chapter 12 Lecture |
|
W |
July 11 |
Chapter 12 Cultural
analysis |
|
F |
July 13 |
Chapter 13-14 Discussion |
|
M |
July 16 |
Chapter 13-14 Lecture Portfolio Due |
|
W |
July 18 |
Chapter 13-14 Cultural analysis Cultural Analysis paper Due |